Featured Posts

May 31, 2010

The last of the May guest podspots

In what was a busy month of podcasting shenanigans, I joined Steve and Brian (aka The Film Cynics) for the full hour of their Victoria, B.C.-based radio show (and LAMMY-nominated podcast), and it was a jam-packed 60 minutes, with a few minutes spent on some departed celebs to TV finale talk to a review of 44 Inch Chest and more.

Check out the full details posted here. Many thanks to the guys for having me on again.
And then...

LAMBcast #23

The Soto Curse lives on!

You know how, back in the ye olde days of VHS, how if you watched a tape too much, it would start to degrade and you'd be messing with the tracking trying to fix it? Well, that probably happened a lot to cult movies; those that were watched time and again by a loving few. So it's fitting, then, that the LAMBcast devoted to talking about cult movies features the audio equivalent of those tracking and degradation issue, as is sounds as though Nick Jobe is joining host Jason Soto from inside of a sewer. That's on fire. During an earthquake. Okay, maybe it's not that bad, but better that I prepare you for the worst, right?

Nevertheless, the two soldier on, even creating an alternate version of LLS since it was just the two of them (more Soto curseness). Stay tuned for that and some Trailer Talk and much, much more (just listen intently).




As usual, the music, as provided royalty-free by Kevin MacLeod's Incompetech website, is the bomb. Big thanks to Kevin for providing this service.

Also, we're still on iTunes, and would still love a review, even if it's a bad one. Thanks for listening!
And then...

May 30, 2010

Stained Glass Cinema Sunday (#94)

Well, I've only got one more entry left in the hopper right now - time to replenish. But I'll still give you this one, and even though I think it's more Beginnerish, I'll call it an Expert to make up for the fact that there's just one.

EXPERT
















Standings:
J.D. - 27
Dreamrot (smacdonn) - 7
Nick, Wendymoon - 6
TheGreatWhiteDope - 5.5
Clive Dangerously - 5
simoncolumb, Steel11Kane (Kano) - 4
Jason/Daniel, David Bishop, Rachel, JLG, Justin - 3
TJMAC510 - 2.5
Evan Derrick, Jason Soto, BD79 - 2
TonyD, Luke Harrington, Adam Ross, Anders, Dave, Big Mike Mendez, Nic Cage, CaptainRon19 - 1

Here are the altered/actual posters from last time:












And then...

May 28, 2010

TGITDNMAR (5/28/10)

It's that time again for TGITDNMAR, which (obviously) stands for Thank God It's The Day New Movies Are Released.

After nearly two months off - thanks a lot, Ladies/Dudes of the 80s Tournaments! - TGITDNMAR makes its return. I missed it, anyway. Unfortunately, it's come back at a pretty bad time...

Prince of Persia
I understand why they're marketing PoP as being from "the producers of Pirates of the Caribbean," what with that series massive success, as well as also being originated from perhaps not the most noble of sources (though video games are surely a step or two ahead of theme park rides).

However, I can't help but think that they're shooting themselves in the foot as well by comparing this Jake Gyllenhaal vehicle to the Depp-Bloom-Knightley caper; Pirates' biggest asset turned out to be its shock value - the fact that a movie that entertaining came from "a theme park ride, can you believe it?!?" added to the word of mouth phenomenon that it became. PoP will have no such in that regard; by being sidled up to Pirates, all it can do is disappoint.

And don't get me wrong, I like Kingsley and Jake as much as the next guy, but is it just me or does the cast seem low-rent?

I dunno - just no interest here whatsoever. Having never played the video game probably isn't helping, either. Maybe if we get really, really bored and feel like watching a shitty movie (it happens).
Fletch's Chance of Viewing (in the theater): 16%

Sex and the City 2
I'm sure I've mentioned this before, but it warrants mentioning again: have I told you how great Mrs. Fletch is?

I have never been dragged to a shitty romantic comedy. Sure, we'll go see something like Definitely, Maybe if we both think it looks good (we did, and it pretty much was), but the Twilights, Notebooks, and Sex and the Citys of the world? Never. Not a chance. And god bless her. She might not go see The Expendables with me, but she's up for just about everything else that I'm up for.

I don't mean to bag on SATC2 too much, though. Yes, I watched the show. With my (at the time) two male roommates. I'm not ashamed of this; SATC was a good show, and even more than that, it was part of HBO's dominant Sunday lineup from some years ago: The Sopranos, Six Feet Under, Oz, with SATC and Curb and/or some crappy comedy that never took off (The Mind of the Married Man, anyone?) paired with it. But we all enjoyed SATC, and we'd be lying if any of us said otherwise (ask Buffett35 if you don't believe me).

The movies, though? No thanks, not at all. Maybe it's the whole girlpower/shoetini *experience* that it's marketed and interpreted as. And I'm just sick to death of Kim Catrall...

Unrelated: uh, what the hell's up with Chris Noth's eyes?
Fletch's Chance of Viewing: 2%

MICMACS
Jean-Pierre Jeunet is back for his first film since 2004's A Very Long Engagement (which I still need to see), and this one appears to be even more full of quirkaliciousness and whimsicality than 20 Amelies. No matter - I'm fully prepared for it, and it's getting pretty good reviews. If it comes to Phoenix, I'm on board.
Fletch's Chance of Viewing: 73%
And then...

Just Because: Yayo


Mr. Escobar: "He's my sister's kid, no father, not too bright... personally, I think he's a retard. I only gave him the job as a favor to my sister, you understand."
And then...

May 27, 2010

Fletch's Film Review: The Joneses

The writers of The Joneses probably thought they were making a biting satire™ about consumerism. To a point, they are. But what they really ended up with was a meta-satire.

Meta-satires are all the rage these days. Think Kick-Ass or Adaptation or Team America: World Police. It's not nearly enough to merely lambaste something anymore; you have to become that which you are ridiculing. The Joneses starts off with a terrific premise: marketing has become so infused in our lifestyles that a corporation has set out to literally market lifestyles. An alpha family (unit) is deployed into a neighborhood and plays house like a real family, all under the guise of selling the hot new clothes, gadgets, sporting goods, etc., to the unknowing consumers amongst them. They are, to borrow from Malcolm Gladwell's The Tipping Point, Mavens, Connectors, and Salespeople all, each one targeted to a specific demographic. They are selling "cool," and making a killing doing so.

It's a great premise, one perfect for our increasingly materialistic world. The problems come in once you get past the setup. The story paints itself into a corner, but more importantly, the longer you watch, the more you realize that in trying to make a comment about consumerism, the film becomes a slave to it. I wasn't just being sold a movie ticket, I was simultaneously being sold the same products that the Joneses are attempting to pawn off on their neighbors. The latest golf clubs, an auto-opening toilet, a vast array of Audis - I wasn't familiar with the frozen food chefs that were name-checked in the movie, but it wouldn't shock me to learn that they were real as well.

Were the film meant to be self-satirizing, that would be one thing. But I don't believe that's the case, and if it is, then the tone and plot of the latter two-thirds sold the concept short, deteriorating instead to a formulaic, feel-good ending. Kinda takes away some of that bite, no?

Fletch's Film Rating:
"You seem a decent fellow...I hate to kill you."
Shaky Cam Rating (details):LAMBScore:
Large Association of Movie BlogsLarge Association of Movie Blogs
And then...

May 26, 2010

The State of the Cabins (5/26/10)

Movies watched for the first time (non-theatrically) since last week:
* The Hammer - As advertised. Adam Carolla still had his radio show when he made The Hammer, so as a former listener, I heard plenty about it not only as it was in production, but also the reaction from the show's crew, guests, and fans. The reaction was overwhelmingly positive, and followed Carolla beyond his radio days and into his days as one of the Lords of Podcasting. I was a loyal listener for a long, long time before finally calling it quits a year or so ago, as I found that in a one-on-one context, Adam made for a shitty interviewer - the guy can't help but dominate the conversation and talk about himself. We're talking 80% of the time...which is fine for a radio show, but then why have guests?

Anyway, I digress. Point is, I started to worry over the months about The Hammer that, with Carolla producing an small, independent film with himself as the star, that it would be 90 minutes of him riffing, or at least 75.

Fears assuaged. The Hammer is indeed the feel good, charming, and funny indie it was made out to be. Carolla is, by comparison, reigned in a lot, as much screen time is given not only to his non-acting, real-life friend/sidekick Oswaldo Castillo (hilariously unintelligible), but also to potentially up-and-comer Harold House Moore, in his first acting gig as a rival boxer. Jane Lynch even pops up in an extended cameo.

Being the small-time film that it is, it's clunky in a few spots, and the acting is spotty as well, particularly from Heather Juergensen, who plays the love interest (and produces as well). Nonetheless, The Hammer is more than worth your time.

* 44 Inch Chest - I'll be joining Steve and Brian of The Film Cynics (again!) this Sunday - for a full hour this time. We'll be reviewing this flick, amongst other things. So, all you Cabin Dwellers over there in Victoria, B.C. (so, Steve, in other words), listen in to CFAX-1070 on Sunday at 3:00 PM. For the rest of you, I'll be posting a link next week for your auditory pleasure (Steve and Brian sound a lot better than I do).

Music I'm currently obsessed with:
Somehow, I never listened to a full Muse album until Watchmen came out. It wasn't until after hearing "Take a Bow" that I thought it was time to give them a fair shake. Of course, it didn't take long at all for me to realize that I was already familiar with more than a handful of songs from them. Hell, I think all of the Black Holes & Revelations disc got radio play - I was just too thick to notice that I all of these songs that I kinda liked were all from the same band.

Fast-forward to this week, when I picked up my fourth CD by them, Origin of Symmetry. I count them as one of my favorite bands, and have at least one song of theirs overtaking my head every week. Can't wait to get some from this latest disc in there as well.

Book I'm currently reading:
Still none. The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest ought to be arriving shortly...
And then...

LOST - FINAL episode


All right this here’s my swan song ladies and gentlemen, the last episode of Lost, my last Lost breakdown, you guys won’t have old kid vegas to kick around anymore. So as for this episode, shockingly… I kind of liked it. The on Island stuff was pretty solid, I got the all-out war I was hoping for, Team Jack killed MiB and saved the world, and a few of them even made it out to live long fruitful lives in the real world.

Off island the big reveal was that their retarded “flash-sideways” timeline was actually a “other dimension” timeline, since apparently they were all in heaven the whole time; I’m a little dubious of this one, a couple too many inconsistencies. I think Cuse and Lindelof called an audible midseason when they realized everyone thought their alternate timeline was retarded (thanks mainly to me and my blogging) and switched it to heaven. But you know what, the heaven interspersals kind of worked in this episode; they didn’t work in any of the season’s other episodes, but for the finale they worked. Even I was a little emotional as Jack saved the Island and simultaneously came to the realization he was dead with his old man. Now let’s get to my final observations on what worked and what didn’t:

-Rose and Bernard, really?? Did we really need them to rescue Desmond just so he could be kidnapped two minutes later, and all so we could get that same retarded speech they gave last season finale about them thinking they were too cool to get involved with the other castaways? Yeah, Jack is busy saving the world while you two are douching it up in a hut, and you’re the ones who are too cool. And what was the deal with them showing up at the Church at the End - none of the castaways even liked them. How did they get an invite? Why not throw Frogurt, Steve, and hell, even Ethan Rom in there? Sure, Rom killed about 5 castaways, but at least he wasn’t old, annoying, a poor actor and didn’t douchily move to the other side of the Island and lecture people about things he didn’t understand.

-Speaking of random fringe characters no one liked showing up, I was kind of a little disappointed they didn’t have a 40-year old Walt show up at the church, even if he was just in the background laughing with Hurley. His bizarre age spurts don’t need to make any sense in heaven, I would have liked to have seen him, just for comedy’s sake. And why does Aaron have to spend eternity as a baby, we assume he led a long life after Jack died… I would have gotten his namesake Aaron Boone to play him.

-I mean going back through the season we can point out a million weird things with the Lost producers heaven, but the three that stand out the most to me are:
1. What is up with being able to have kids in heaven, now that doesn’t make a lick of sense… I’m looking at you David Shepherd. The obvious explanation here is they were going to make it an alternate reality and wimped out because that was such a stupid, stupid idea, or they just threw him in there to throw everyone off the scent of it being heaven, or maybe it was just some random kid who died on the island and Jack and Juliet just pretended he was their kid. They should have had that kid play the young Jacob in the Early island flashback, now that would have been a mindf^&$.

2. How the heck did Keamy slip into heaven yet Michael is still stuck on the Island whispering to random people. I mean Keamy killed Alex in cold blood, he was such an over-the-top bad guy it was ridiculous. I mean couldn’t they have cut to him being trapped in a hut with Rose and Bernard for all of eternity? That would have been an appropriate fate for him.

3. Why is Sayid the only one who doesn’t get to be with the girl he liked? I mean, did the producers just forget about Nadia? He loved her since he was 5, they got married, when she was killed he went psycho and killed a bunch of people for Ben Linus (speaking of, did we ever find out who those people were?), or maybe Sayid was being punished for all the people he killed by having to watch his brother nail the girl he loved, while being stuck with some random chick he banged because he was deserted on an Island. (More likely, the producers were seduced with the prospect of a Maggie Grace cameo, and couldn’t find any other way to work her in. I must admit though, I did enjoy seeing her).

-I get why they had to end where they did, because if they had done any flashforwards during the season it would have ruined the ending for everyone, but I still wouldn’t mind seeing an epilogue episode where we find out what happened with Hurley, Kate, Sawyer, Alpert and of course Dez. We know Kate “waited a long time for Jack”, but I mean she had to have at least banged Sawyer a few times off-island after Jack died. And what about Alpo being reintroduced to society after 500 years on an island? And will young Charlie Hume develop any super-powers passed on from his father, and if so will they form a father/son crime-fighting team? (Sounds like a spin-off to me. They could have Mr. Paik and Ji-Yeon be the supervillains they are constantly trying to thwart.)

-All in all a pretty good series though, obviously some pointless plots and lame mysteries over the seasons, but as a whole I guess most of our questions were answered, though the answer to most of them as we said a few weeks ago was “magic.” Sure we all have a few questions we’d still like answered. (e.g. Why did Jack’s magic tattoos make Asian people hate him?) But I think we got the closure we needed from the finale and can say the 6 seasons of Lost were pretty solid as a total product. So good luck out there and godspeed. I will answer any lingering questions people have about the show or any leftover mysteries in the comments section.
And then...

May 25, 2010

Fletch's Favored Five: 1993 in Film

Now, the sixth in a continuing series in which I count down my favorites from a particular year in film. Previous entries:

1997 * 1991 * 1984 * 1988
* 2002

I'm going to use Wikipedia to kickstart my brain, year by year, and I'll throw out a Favored Five here and there. If you want to refresh your memory in a similar fashion, just go to Wiki and type "[four-character year] in film." Here's the one for 1993. I won't pretend that Wiki is the end-all, be-all of filmic knowledge or that these yearly lists are 100% accurate, but they're an excellent place to start and a great resource.

1993
This is a weird, weird year I think, not only for me personally, but in general. In line with the grunge/Generation X movements (for lack of a better term) that were occurring right about the time, it seems to be a real line in the sand where the last holdouts of 80s sensibilities made their way through and gave way to cynicism and more modern storytelling. The list of films that not only make up my favored five here, but also the lengthy honorable mentions really portray this. There's a strange mix of movies that might've been 80s leftovers (Demolition Man; Son-in-Law) mixed in with edgier fare (Last Action Hero, which might've been a failure but was still an winking take on the action genre; Jurassic Park, perhaps the forebearer to the modern action adventure).

It also holds special for me due to sheer volume. Good, bad or ugly, I've likely seen more films from this year than just about any other film, at least in terms of mainstream Hollywood films. I was 16-17 in 1993, and yes, it shows quite a bit in my favorites. However, I think this is right about the time, thanks to movies like my number one, where I went from being just a movie fan to an all-out movie geek. I sought ought indies like my number two (and Romeo is Bleeding and Boxing Helena and Flesh and Bone) pretty from early on, and watched and appreciated some of the more middle-of-the-road fare perhaps more than I should have.

It's weird - short of my top selections, I wouldn't argue too hardly for any of these films (that I've seen) to be considered seminal works, but damned if I wouldn't be physically pained if all of the movies from 1993 up and disappeared. Lot of good nostalgia here, and movies that I can and will watch time and again (Rising Sun, anyone?).

Notable movies not yet seen:
In the Name of the Father
The Piano
Point of No Return
The Program
Schindler's List

Honorable mentions:
Cliffhanger
Falling Down
The Firm
The Fugitive
Jurassic Park
Last Action Hero
Much Ado About Nothing
The Nightmare Before Christmas
Rising Sun
The Sandlot

5. Demolition Man
There's really no excuse for this to be here, but I've got such a soft spot for it. In fact, since I never did get all much into either the Rocky or Rambo series, I could make the argument that Stallone's two 1993 entries rank as my favorite films of his, with the first being a (relatively) no bullshit actioner, and this being an ambitious one that touches on class warfare and the future of sexual politics, all the while featuring some of the most laughable dialogue you'll see this side of, well, Rocky IV.

4. Tombstone
Probably the clubhouse leader in the "Films Fletch loves but somehow does not yet own." I've heard smatterings from some folks recently that say that the film - outside of Val Kilmer's performance - doesn't hold up all that well. Not sure if I agree; it certainly has its slow moments, and heavy-handed ones, and just plain theatrical ones (any scene with Priestley and/or Zane and/or Delaney is a tad painful), but on the whole? Sounds like a purchase/re-watch is definitely in order.

3. Groundhog Day
The current incarnation of Bill Murray is still pretty great and all, but don't you long for a straight-up comedy from the guy? I think the last one he did was Osmosis Jones, and not only was that in 2001, but it sucked and no one saw it (okay, it's not that bad, but you get the jist). Somehow I doubt Ghostbusters III will quench my thirst. Bing!

2. Dazed and Confused
Timeless. But then again, any well-executed period piece ought to be, and that's the beauty of them. Hard for a movie to seem "too 90s" when it's set in 1976. Still my favorite from Linklater.

1. True Romance
Need I explain myself here?
And then...

Poll results; new poll

Well, I'm certainly glad to hear that at least most of you like the new template around here. I realize it's not perfect, but I think it works well with what I want for BC. I love the Featured Posts header, and I love how all of the widgets fit together so nicely. Stay tuned for an eventual logo overhaul as well.

New poll stays meta. I've been somewhat schizo over the years, starting and stopping new features. I usually do so for a good reason, whether it's because of a vibe I'm picking up on or a general lack or activity or if I feel like something has just run its course. Still, I'm curious - which feature that you haven't seen in awhile do you miss most (if any)?
And then...

Fletch's Favored Five: 1993 in Film

Now, the sixth in a continuing series in which I count down my favorites from a particular year in film. Previous entries:

1997 * 1991 * 1984 * 1988
* 2002

I'm going to use Wikipedia to kickstart my brain, year by year, and I'll throw out a Favored Five here and there. If you want to refresh your memory in a similar fashion, just go to Wiki and type "[four-character year] in film." Here's the one for 1993. I won't pretend that Wiki is the end-all, be-all of filmic knowledge or that these yearly lists are 100% accurate, but they're an excellent place to start and a great resource.

1993
This is a weird, weird year I think, not only for me personally, but in general. In line with the grunge/Generation X movements (for lack of a better term) that were occurring right about the time, it seems to be a real line in the sand where the last holdouts of 80s sensibilities made their way through and gave way to cynicism and more modern storytelling. The list of films that not only make up my favored five here, but also the lengthy honorable mentions really portray this. There's a strange mix of movies that might've been 80s leftovers (Demolition Man; Son-in-Law) mixed in with edgier fare (Last Action Hero, which might've been a failure but was still an winking take on the action genre; Jurassic Park, perhaps the forebearer to the modern action adventure).

It also holds special for me due to sheer volume. Good, bad or ugly, I've likely seen more films from this year than just about any other film, at least in terms of mainstream Hollywood films. I was 16-17 in 1993, and yes, it shows quite a bit in my favorites. However, I think this is right about the time, thanks to movies like my number one, where I went from being just a movie fan to an all-out movie geek. I sought ought indies like my number two (and Romeo is Bleeding and Boxing Helena and Flesh and Bone) pretty from early on, and watched and appreciated some of the more middle-of-the-road fare perhaps more than I should have.

It's weird - short of my top selections, I wouldn't argue too hardly for any of these films (that I've seen) to be considered seminal works, but damned if I wouldn't be physically pained if all of the movies from 1993 up and disappeared. Lot of good nostalgia here, and movies that I can and will watch time and again (Rising Sun, anyone?).

Notable movies not yet seen:
In the Name of the Father
The Piano
Point of No Return
The Program
Schindler's List

Honorable mentions:
Cliffhanger
Falling Down
The Firm
The Fugitive
Jurassic Park
Last Action Hero
Much Ado About Nothing
The Nightmare Before Christmas
Rising Sun
The Sandlot

5. Demolition Man
There's really no excuse for this to be here, but I've got such a soft spot for it. In fact, since I never did get all much into either the Rocky or Rambo series, I could make the argument that Stallone's two 1993 entries rank as my favorite films of his, with the first being a (relatively) no bullshit actioner, and this being an ambitious one that touches on class warfare and the future of sexual politics, all the while featuring some of the most laughable dialogue you'll see this side of, well, Rocky IV.

4. Tombstone
Probably the clubhouse leader in the "Films Fletch loves but somehow does not yet own." I've heard smatterings from some folks recently that say that the film - outside of Val Kilmer's performance - doesn't hold up all that well. Not sure if I agree; it certainly has its slow moments, and heavy-handed ones, and just plain theatrical ones (any scene with Priestley and/or Zane and/or Delaney is a tad painful), but on the whole? Sounds like a purchase/re-watch is definitely in order.

3. Groundhog Day
The current incarnation of Bill Murray is still pretty great and all, but don't you long for a straight-up comedy from the guy? I think the last one he did was Osmosis Jones, and not only was that in 2001, but it sucked and no one saw it (okay, it's not that bad, but you get the jist). Somehow I doubt Ghostbusters III will quench my thirst. Bing!

2. Dazed and Confused
Timeless. But then again, any well-executed period piece ought to be, and that's the beauty of them. Hard for a movie to seem "too 90s" when it's set in 1976. Still my favorite from Linklater.

1. True Romance
Need I explain myself here?
And then...

May 23, 2010

Stained Glass Cinema Sunday (#93)

BEGINNER















EXPERT
















Standings:
J.D. - 27
Dreamrot (smacdonn) - 7
Nick, Wendymoon - 6
Clive Dangerously - 5
simoncolumb, Steel11Kane (Kano) - 4
Jason/Daniel, David Bishop, Rachel, JLG, Justin - 3
TheGreatWhiteDope, TJMAC510 - 2.5
Evan Derrick, Jason Soto, BD79 - 2
TonyD, Luke Harrington, Adam Ross, Anders, Dave, Big Mike Mendez, Nic Cage, CaptainRon19 - 1

Here are the altered/actual posters from last time:












And then...

May 20, 2010

LAMBcast #22

It's the moment you've all been waiting for! The glitz and glamour of the LAMMYs have made their way to the LAMBcast. That's right - the main post and voting instructions will arrive shortly, but this is the spot if you want to be amongst the first to hear the nominations for the 2010 LAMMY Awards.

I was joined by a rogue's gallery of awards commentators (specifically, Rachel Thuro, Nick Jobe and Travis McCollum) as we spelled out the 15 categories, the nominees, and where applicable, gave a shout out to the winners of years past. Along the way, a few extended discussions (e.g. What does it mean to be a Horror/Sci-Fi Blog, and is a specific award relevant for them?) and at the end, our usual games of Last LAMB Standing and some Trailer Talk.




As usual, the music, as provided royalty-free by Kevin MacLeod's Incompetech website, is the bomb. Big thanks to Kevin for providing this service.

You can find us on iTunes; just go to the Podcasts section and search for "LAMBcast." And hey - while you're on iTunes, why don't you go ahead and either rate the LAMBcast or write a review of it. Better yet, do both! It'll help us get noticed by the overlords at Apple and earn worldwide fame...or something like that.
And then...

Seriously Overdue Movie Review: The Blind Side

Somewhere along the way last winter, either the vast hordes of people that saw The Blind Side or the scads of early critics that anointed it worthy of being seen by the aforementioned scads of people that saw it (my research-free assumption on this point: Gene Shalit types) looked at this movie and judged it for what they thought it was, or what it appeared to be and not for what it really was. Somewhere along the way, people saw Sandra Bullock "in a role like you've never seen her before," (which is to say, the role of Erin Brockovich or her ilk) and became convinced that this was a feel-good movie about love conquering all and helping out your fellow man (-child) or being color-blind or class-blind or some combination of all of the above.

I have a hard time blaming them for seeing The Blind Side in this light, as it was certainly put on this way. As I comically alluded to a couple weeks ago, one wouldn't have been crazy to deem it Houseguest 2, either. All the traits of a light farce were there: stunt casting in the way of a country music star and a gang of real-life college football coaches appearing on screen just long enough to pitch their programs in 15 seconds or less, a precocious (read: annoying) child wise beyond his years, and a general air that seemed to say "there are no consequences to be found here whatsoever - don't think about this too deeply, because we sure didn't, either."

The thing is, though, The Blind Side purports to be a true story (or at least inspired or whatever euphemism they used for "making it up as they went along" this time around). And that true story is a two-ton heavy one with cultural touchstones that have the ability to set people off from all sides. It's based on the detailed writings of a book written not very long ago about events that took place sometime within the framework of everyone's memory. In other words, this ain't about the Civil War, and you can't get away with a load of bullshit and figure that you won't have to worry about it because everyone involved has been dead for a century.

And yet, it takes little more than a handful of orange and yellow Nerf darts to blow all kinds of holes in the story presented, and it's not like those gaps or additions have been replaced by anything substantial. The minorest of minor lip service is given to Michael Oher's background, race, place in the Tuohy household, etc. Things that could and/or would (especially in the South) be major, major obstacles to that happy ending are but mere blips on the radar, no more troubling to the family than a headache might be to you. The husband and wife don't discuss potentially adopting a strange teenage boy - it's just glossed over with a glib one-liner that plays to the "what she wants, she gets" stereotype by the comic-relief husband (who's supposed to be a multi-millionaire businessman at this point). Haha - how cute those two when discussing such immaterial matters!

Of course, the larger issue with the film as it's set up is that there's no tension whatsoever; NFL fans will already know the outcome - that Oher not got his scholarship to Ole Miss but was a first-round draft pick of the Baltimore Ravens - while those unaware won't have to worry about Oher's future anyway. After all, he was the adopted son of an upper-class family; why were any of them all that worried about a football scholarship anyway? NFL or no, I don't imagine that poverty was in his future at that point regardless. So, the filmmakers must have decided "Hey, we have a film with no drama, so we might as well make it folksy and charming!"

What lost potential.

Fletch's Film Rating:
"You seem a decent fellow...I hate to kill you."
Shaky Cam Rating (details):LAMBScore:
Large Association of Movie BlogsLarge Association of Movie Blogs
And then...

May 19, 2010

The State of the Cabins (5/19/10)

Movies watched for the first time (non-theatrically) since last week:
* The Rocker - Very nearly the definition of "middle of the road." There's nothing to hate about The Rocker (save perhaps for seeing too much of Rainn Wilson's naked flesh), but there's not too much to love, either. Wilson's a drummer that got dumped by his former band RIGHT when they were about to hit it big. An idiotic action sequence ensues. (On the bright side, his former bands mates include Will Arnett and Bradley Cooper.) Fast-forward 20 years and the guy is on a fast-track to Nowheresville, and to boot, he lives in Cleveland (which, if it weren't bad enough, means he has to see the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame frequently). Yada yada yada nephew's band yada yada yada join together yada yada yada redemption, lessons learned, Christina Applegate.

For some reason, I like recording and watching these average movies for late Friday/Saturday nights or early Saturday/Sunday mornings. I guess I have a thing for Movies to Fall Asleep To - probably the lack of guilt that comes when I finally do nod off. I know I can always pick them up later.

* Observe and Report - Speaking of which, I turned this one on Monday night at around 11:15. Fast-forward to 90 minutes later and I've watched the whole thing. Couldn't fall asleep to this - it's too weird, too intense, pretty funny, and all-out nuts. I knew it was compared favorably (in terms of characterization) to Taxi Driver, and the comparison is apt - Seth Rogen's Ronnie is batshit crazy, and the film does a great job of neither condoning nor admonishing his behavior.

I still don't know how much I liked O & R, but I know I did like it. Outside of Rogen, the characters are awfully thin, and there's not a ton to the story, but the lead is handled with such care, and is such a memorable character, that's it hard not to dig. Imagine Nick Frost's character in Hot Fuzz taken to the 10th degree and you might come up with Ronnie. Michael Peña is pretty damn funny, too.

Music I'm currently obsessed with:
So we're sitting in The Cheesecake Factory (PLUG!) the other day and an instrumental song is playing. It sounds familiar as hell, but I can't place it. I can't concentrate on whatever it is we're talking about because I keep hearing the song out of the corner of my ear and it keeps bugging me that I can't think of what it is. Can't use the Shazam app (PLUG!) on Mrs. Fletch's iPhone since the ambient noise in the restaurant is way too loud. The notes "doooooo dee doo, du-doo du-dee doo" keep running through my head. The only thing that keeps coming to me is the phrase "(something) is our friend," but I can't think of what that something is, only that it makes for a weird statement. Later, I'm also picturing a guy wearing a fez, though I'm not sure why. At one point, Mrs. Fletch even says the name of the song, though neither of us make a connection.

Turns out it was this song:



The version I was thinking of was from the prom scene in American Pie, where some dude rocking a fez is indeed belting out the tune (and makes a bad song even worse). CACTUS is our friend! I live in the desert, and cacti ARE my friends (ok, not really)! Shame on me.

Anyway, that p.o.s. song has been in my head for like three days now.

Book I'm currently reading:
None.
And then...

May 18, 2010

Just because: Stand By Me


Because it's been way too long since I did one of these. Also because I bought this for $5.00 at Target recently. Also because Mrs. Fletch has yet to see it.
And then...

May Guest Podspot #2

(This time re-posted from Random Ramblings of a Demented Doorknob, where if you didn't already know, Nick co-hosts The Demented Encyclopedia along with The Movie Encyclopedia's Travis. See what they did there? Anyway, details below. If you've ever wanted to hear me do awful impersonations of actors spouting racist lines, this is your chance.)

For our tenth episode, we bring on guest host Dylan Fields of Blog Cabins and The Large Association of Movie Blogs. To compensate for such a long episode last week, we have a bit shorter of an episode this week.

After some quick plugs, in which Dylan plugs the LAMMY Awards, and I plug a scene from my movie-in-progress, we move on to the main topic. The topic this week is "That Guys." These are the actors and actresses who appear in numerous films and television shows, but usually as a secondary character and the common public can't really remember their names (hence "that guy"). We go over some of our favorites (actors and performances).

After that, we move on to Reality Round-Up and start off with our most detailed Survivor discussion yet, mostly because our guest host this week is actually a Survivor fan. From there we move on to a quick American Idol discussion where Travis and I actually have yet another debate and must agree to disagree.

Then, after a quick "Recommend A...", we get into our Mono-Dia-logues of the Week, where none of us are practiced/rehearsed--and you can tell, except for Dylan, who shows us up with a scene from True Romance.

And that's it for this week. Stay tuned after the closing theme for a bit extra!



Thanks goes out to Kevin MacLeod's Imcompetech Website for the music. As always, you can use the player above to listen to the podcast, or you can search iTunes, where we are also available for download. The earlier episodes are being removed from the player for space, but you can still always download them on iTunes. Also, please become a Fan on Facebook... then you can give us your input for the podcast and will probably end up on the show during the D-Bag segment. But as for now... enjoy!
And then...

May 16, 2010

Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains Episode 14 (the Finale!) Recap/Live Blog

6:58: Damnit, the show's starting early and the whole gang isn't here and ready in the living room. So I'll be starting off a couple minutes behind already, though I'm sure to catch up at the first commercial break.

7:01: Let me start off with this: I know I've been (jokingly) saying for weeks now that the producers have been pimping us for a Colby victory, but the only way that that could/should possibly happen would be if he were to make it to the final three, and the remaining Villains would be idiots to take him there. That means that Colby - who's been awful at challenges all season - would have to win both Immunity Challenges in order to make the final Council. Has he really been hustling them (and us) with his awful play? Or will the producers figure out a way to rig the challenges in his favor (if that's possible)? I'll be pulling him for no other reason than that he's the underdog at this point, but I don't like his chances at all.

7:05: How exactly have the other players let TWO former winners (read: millionaires) stay in the game this long? Aren't they supposed to be the first people targeted?

7:06: Wow, this is a long intro. What, 10 minutes so far?

7:08: You know you're a memorable player when you won the previous season and I barely can recall who you are. Natalie? Who's that?

7:08: I think Russell just admitted being wrong at something. That's a first.

7:12: What a terrible time for a "break the other players' tiles" challenge for Colby. So much for the producers rigging the game for him. He's --

7:13: Nevermind - it's yet another stamina challenge, which I'm back to welcoming (this is the finale, after all). Not that this gives Colby any better odds - he'll probably be out within three minutes...

7:14: Of all the people left, who would you say is the safest in the game at this point. Improbably, I say Jeri. She's nearly a lock for the final four, and less likable players like Russ, Parv and Sandra would be somewhat follish to take her to the final three.

7:15: Sandra and Jeri out. Colby FTW?

7:16: I'm sure the players are just loving the wind that's picking up in this very delicate balancing game...

7:17: Parvati looks locked in.

7:19: Unsurprisingly, she won. That was pretty impressive.

7:19: And we're back live! (Well, still tape-delayed to the West Coast. As live as it's gonna get, anyway.)

7:23: Colby using the old "I'm not gonna try to turn you guys against each other" play. Sneaky. That's right up there with the "I'm thinking about quitting the game" play in the annals of Survivor strategies.

7:24: Of course, not a minute later does Colby admit that his speech was a last-gasp attempt at sympathy. Wisely, the first person he goes to is Russell, playing on the Oil Man's insecurities about Parvati and Sandra. It just might get interesting. I would certainly consider keeping Colby (despite what I said above), at least if I were Russell. Were three Villains to make the final Council, and Russell were one of them, I'd peg him as the least likely to win it all.

7:30: Yeah, I just don't see anything happening here. A lot of potential drama, but Colby's gone.

7:31: Indeed. Bad as you played, Colby, you made it to the top five and were the last Hero standing. Hold your head high, and do your best to turn this into another Curb Your Enthusiasm role.

7:33: I gotta admit, I'm ready and willing to see The Karate Kid remake, despite the presence of the awful-acting Smith kid. I won't go so far as to say that I have high hopes for it, but it certainly doesn't look terrible.

7:37: I have to idea which alliance is truly the strongest amongst the final four. Weeks ago, I would've said Parv and Russ, but not only does Russ seem tighter with Jeri these days, but Parv has taken to Sandra quite a bit since her BFF Danielle got voted out.

7:38: TRAIL OF DEAD!!! They moved this segment up in the episode - I'm pretty sure it doesn't normally occur until there are just three players left, right? Or am I taking crazy pills?

7:40: Okay, I think I am crazy. The whole trail of dead segue into the final Immunity Challenge does seem to ring a bell. This is what happens when you skip this segment season after season.

7:41: The best part about all-star seasons? I'm actually not left saying "I have no idea who that is" or "Who the hell is that chick?" during all of it. Nice to know who all of the dead players are! It actually makes this segment halfway tolerable.

7:43: James, you didn't just talk more. You were more of a dick. Next time, try ditching that strategy.

7:44: I think Coach is juuuust about ready to write the screenplay of his life. Hitting theaters in 2012 (no coincidence that the Apocalypse has been foretold to occur that year as well).

Here you go, Coach - I made this right now just for you (well, I pasted your head on an already existing image, but you get the point). Feel free to use it:


7:46: Candice: I'm pretty sure that if you show up on a future season, I'll say the same thing I did at the start of this one: "Who's Candice?"

7:48: Colby, give it a rest with the "I'm older" card. Wiki says you're 36, for chrissakes, which I think would make you the second youngest of the remaining players. You're also (supposedly) in much better shape than the rest of 'em. Enough.

7:57: Had to pause for a couple minutes. Be behind until the next commercial break.

7:58: On a whim, I'm picking Jeri to win this challenge. A blindfolded maze? Is there a favorite for such a thing?

8:03: Okay, this is close - now I'm just rooting for Jeri so that I'll be right.

8:04: Holy shit, that was close. All three players - Russ, Jeri and Parvati withing inches of the final Immunity Necklace, yet Russ grabs it by the hair on his chinny chin chin. That was intense.

8:07: Sandra's hilarious. "I don't care - I'll take the $100,000." Pretty sure I'd be voting out Parvati as well were I in Russ's shoes. Though Jeri might be a bit of a threat considering how few people she pissed off during the game, along with her status as a non-winner.

8:10: I'm sure the fact that his seasons are back-to-back plays on our emotions a bit, but it's hard not to really consider Russ, for all his faults, one of the game's greatest players. Back-to-back final three! What more do you need to say?

8:13: Who's been protecting whom? The Russ-Parv power struggle never ceases to end. Who wears the pants in that relationship? I fear we might never know.

8:15: Someone needs to tell Amanda that she looks better sans makeup.

8:15: No need to read the votes, Jeff - we already know it's Parvati Jeri.

8:16: I admit, I was shocked there, especially considering what we heard Russ say as he cast his vote. I have to believe it was the wrong decision, though. As Mrs. Fletch is saying right now, if the jury were to consider giving their vote to a player that "really played the game yada yada yada," now there are two of those people left instead of just one, and frankly, Parv is a lot more likable than Russ, fake smile or no.

8:25: Yeah, not a whole lot going on, as you well know. Breakfast of champions, chat about how great we are, prepare answers for the Final Tribal.

8:26: This thing about "So-and-so has played the game of Survivor longer than anyone else ever!!" is retarded. Playing in three separate seasons certainly helps.

8:28: Revenge of the Socks! Russ burns peoples' socks, and now Sandra burns his hat. Hilarious.

8:29: Sandra's almost convincing me to vote for her, but in the end, I think this is Parv's to lose.

8:31: A poor play by Sandra in saying that "she tried to get Russell voted out three times." Uh, he's still there - how good could you be?

8:38: Somewhere along the way, I forgot that Parvati also won a season. Perhaps Russ has a distinct advantage after all. Though I don't know that people would vote for him solely because he's the lone non-winner standing.

8:39: Christ, Amanda looks like ass. Again, ditch the makeup, and while you're at it, put your hair in a ponytail - it suits you and your long face much better.

8:40: Coach just said "the penitent man shall pass." I think not of the Bible and yet of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. I know I'm not the only one.

8:41: Coach is wearing an Affliction t-shirt, to the surprise of no one at all in the audience.

8:43: Sandra again making the case for Russell, telling the jury how he was the one taking them out and how much she wanted him out and couldn't do it.

8:44: These jury members are doling out some really weak questions/comments so far. I know I get them for having vitriol after sitting in the jury box for weeks, but the opposite (this) is much worse. I want some fireworks, damnit!

8:45: If ever there's a Total Recall remake (there is, in production right now, I believe), I'm begging the producers to cast Danielle and her uni-boob as its version of the three-titted stripper. No additional makeup necessary!

8:47: Speaking of Selleck - the mustache is angry!

8:50: Rupert's looked pissed for weeks now - this ought to be good.

8:50: Funny, I seem to recall Rupert shaking Russ's hand just recently when his neck was on the line. Strange how desperation makes Russ a much better person, no? Spare me the false indignation.

8:56: That said, Russ can't be feeling all that good after that Council. He got his ass kicked up and down the street. Looks like another Sandra win, after all???

8:58: Christ, is Russ gonna get ANY votes?

8:58: I can't believe how many votes they're showing us. I guess that means it'll be coming down to the last vote. 5-4 in favor of....?

8:59: Hahahahahaha - they played an eagle sound effect at the end of Coach's speech! Effing awesome!

9:01: Johnny Fairplay in the house!?!? Say what??? I thought that guy was banned from all future Survivor events.

9:02: Russell...really not good at looking happy for others.

9:03: Sandra wins it 6-3 over Parvati. Impressive. Coming into tonight, I don't think I would have guessed that. The big question for Russell is, were you to play for a third time, after making the final vote twice and seeing that strategy not work, do ya think you would try something different? I sure hope so, but knowing how stubborn the guy is, I wouldn't bet on it.

9:19: I'm back from a short break, but only to say goodbye. To this episode (two hours is enough - you're on your own for the reunion show), to the season, and - unless there's a change of heart - to my days as a Survivor live blogger. It's been a fun run, but I think I've said that I have to say about the show. Thanks to those that have kept up with my snarky takes for the past god-knows-how-many seasons.

Survivor news at Survivor.com
Survivor homepage at CBS.com
Interviews with the castoffs at The Movie Encyclopedia
And then...