Featured Posts

Sep 16, 2010

30 dAyS oF cRaZy: Psycho

Did I tell you DeeDee would get psycho on us or what? There's a ton of info here - be careful when swallowing it all down...

Much thanks to DeeDee for her big, big support of this blog-a-thon.

Stay tuned throughout September for nuttiness an
d zaniness of all varieties - click here for the full lineup, and click here for prior entries (which won't do you much good today, what with this being the first - madness!).

Shower Will Never Be The Same Again" ....[Editor's Note: Writer Andrew Katsis, Wrote This Review On Friday, May 16, 2008 WARNING:According to writer Andrew Katsis...Plot and/or ending details may follow!!!!

In order to read writer Andrew Katsis' review of "Psycho"....Just click on the following link... Shooting Lessons 1000 Repeat Viewing: Psycho (1960, Alfred Hitchcock) TSPDT placing: #30]

[Editor's Note: About The Poster...It's Polish/Czech

Czech Hitchcock - The Birds + Psycho Poster Combination...


Czech poster for a double bill of the Alfred Hitchcock films "The Birds" and "Psycho".

www.hitchcockwiki.com/blog/?p=496

"There's something wonderfully surreal and slightly unsettling about many of the Czech and Polish Hitchcock film posters."

According To Director Alfred Hitchcock...

"Naturally, the knife never touched the body; it was all done in the montage."



























Directed by: Alfred Hitchcock
Written by: Robert Bloch (novel), Joseph Stefano (screenplay)
Starring: Anthony Perkins, Janet Leigh, Vera Miles, John Gavin, Martin Balsam, and John McIntire.

June, 1960. The movie theatre is quiet; 45 minutes ago, the halls were buzzing with movement and anticipation, but not anymore. Nobody has been allowed into the cinema since the picture began, and the audience is dead quiet. Through the walls of the theatre, one can hear the muffled whirr of running water.
Silence. A indistinct shadow is seen approaching through the curtain. Accompanied by the fierce screech of violins, hundreds of voices suddenly utter a deafening chorus of horrified shock and surprise; some patrons collapse into the aisle. Bernard Hermann continues to pound the violin with extraordinary intensity, and a bloody streak carves its path towards the drainpipe. Audience members reel with a frantic mixture of stunned confusion and gripping fear. The Master of Suspense, Alfred Hitchcock, has just painted the most extraordinary masterstroke of his distinguished career. The simple act of taking a shower will never again be the same.


Though he produced many films that could justifiably be considered masterpieces, it is unlikely that Hitchcock ever directed anything more popular and influential than Psycho (1960). The first of only two Hitchcock horror films, it shocked many with its unique narrative structure, and the infamous "shower scene" has become permanently imprinted in the movie-going public's collective memory. Hitchcock allegedly produced the film in order to reclaim his designation as

"The Master of Suspense," as he considered Frenchman Henri-Georges Clouzot to have temporarily seized the title with The Wages of Fear (1953) and especially Les Diaboliques (1955). Interestingly, the latter film has a particularly alarming bathtub sequence, and perhaps Psycho was the film through which Hitchcock was able to respond to (and improve upon) the achievements of his chief rival. Gone are the larger-than-life artistic flourishes of Vertigo (1958) and North by Northwest (1959) – this is the Master of Suspense at his leanest and meanest, a film completely stripped of its spectacle and lowered into the unfathomable depths of the disturbed human mind.

Adapted by Joseph Stefano from Robert Bloch's 1959 novel, Psycho opens with the character of Marion Crane (Janet Leigh), a real-estate secretary who impulsively steals $40,000 from her boss and flees in the direction of her California boyfriend.


Her cross-country flight ultimately leads her to the Bates Motel, managed by the awkward and mild-mannered Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins), a man who submits loyally to the wishes of his mentally-ill, domineering mother. Meanwhile, Marion's boyfriend Sam Loomis (John Gavin) and sister Lila (Vera Miles) set out in pursuit, their search ending – inevitably – at the Bates motel.

The story sporadically shifts from one character to the other; after convincing audiences that Marion Crane is "the wrong man" of so many of his previous pictures, Hitchcock deftly strikes at the heart of their sympathies.

In his early film Sabotage (1936), the director had condemned his own decision to murder a character with whom the viewer had been asked to identify, though here he once again dared to break his own rules, and we've never forgotten it.

Paramount was so aghast at the story's graphic subject matter, labelling it "too repulsive," that Hitchcock's budget was severely restricted, and the director was forced to finance the film through his own Shamley Productions. These budget limitations proved crucial in developing the unforgettable atmosphere, and were a major factor in his decision to film is black-and-white (which he also did to avoid incurring the wrath of the censors).

Though Psycho received a mixed critical response upon its release, its commercial success was extraordinary, and film-goers lined entire city blocks to experience the director's latest. Conversely, fellow British director Michael Powell's thematically-similar Peeping Tom (1960) had been severely trashed by critics and audiences alike just months earlier, and the career of the beloved filmmaker was, for all practical purposes, left in ruins.

Furthermore, the success of Psycho triggered the emergence of the "slasher" flick, and subsequent years saw a slew of inferior, gory and imaginatively-titled knock-offs, such as Maniac (1963), Paranoia (1963) and Fanatic (1965).

Though discussions of Psycho rarely stray from the film's more disturbing moments, it's interesting to consider the various crucial scenes of human interaction. Marion's supper with Norman in the parlour room, surrounded by the seemingly-passive but strangely-threatening stuffed birds, is a masterpiece of nervous tension, awkwardness, and the tiny inflections of human speech that communicate more than mere words ever could.

Anthony Perkins plays the role of Norman Bates to quirky perfection, and his character {perhaps modelled from Dennis Weaver's jittery hotel night manager in Touch of Evil (1958) – also starring Janet Leigh} is a man who initially demands our pity and understanding. Even after the atrocity in the shower, Hitchcock, as he also did in Frenzy (1972), builds a suspense sequence around a villain's attempts to conceal the traces of his crime.

Martin Balsam is rarely mentioned when discussing the film, but his characterisation of detective Milton Arbogast is letter-perfect, his shrewd but amenable tone successfully lulling Norman into a false sense of triumph, and yet the audience knows full well that the experienced investigator sees the transparency of his lies.
Despite the prevalence of cultural spoofs and references, Psycho is a thriller that still holds up exceptionally well, even though most viewers are fully-aware of the first major twist. When I first watched the film several years ago, I was completely ignorant of Mother's true identity, and I gasped aloud at the revelation in the fruit cellar, the swinging lightbulb casting a shifting luminance on the rotting corpse of Norma Bates, as Bernard Herrmann's intense, imaginative and very memorable musical score screeches in the background.

Few moments in cinema have succeeded in giving me the same icy chill as the image of Norman in the prison cell, consumed by the mental consciousness of his overbearing mother, and that sinister smile that fades subliminally into the decaying shadow of a human skull. Norman Bates will continue to live on in my nightmares.

[Editor's Note:If You Would Like To Find Out Additional Information About Director Alfred Hitchcock's "Shower Sequence" With The Story Board By Saul Bass...Then Just Visit The Following Links...]

(Hitchcock talking to Truffaut about the shower scene in Psycho)

"

Naturally, the knife never touched the body; it was all done in the montage."

According to Dave (The Creator Of Hitchcock's Website Over There On Wikipedia..."I've spent a good hour or so this evening watching those 8 frames over and over again…

However, when analyzed frame by frame, one of the short segments does appear to show a knife piercing Marion's flesh. It is only 8 frames in length (or 1/3 of a second) and the final frame is this:

I've spent a good hour or so this evening watching those 8 frames over and over again…

I think the sequence was achieved quite simply — what we are seeing in the final film is reversed footage. What was actually shot begins with the knife held against the flesh, and then it is pulled away (up and out of frame).

Don't believe me? Then have a play with this web page , which lets you run the sequence both ways at two different speeds.

There are two things, which I think, give it away:

as the knife is pulled away, it leaves behind a steam of small water droplets

the motion of the shower spray seems more "natural" in the version where the knife is pulled away

In addition, on the final frame, I think we can see the impression on the skin of where the knife was resting.

Finally, the movement of the midriff again seems more natural when the frames are shown in reverse. As the knife is pulled back, Marion moves her body away.

At first glance, the knife does appear to have cut into the belly. However, I think the darkness we see on the left of the end of the blade is shadow (the light source is away to the left of the frame).


In this image, the edge of the blade is highlighted in green, and it's shadow outlined in blue. What we're seeing is the tip of the blade against the skin.

The 7 previous frames show the knife swooping downwards quickly into the frame. How could they ensure the person holding the knife stopped in time to avoid stabbing Marion (it's not certain if we're seeing Janet Leigh's midriff or her body double, Marli Renfro)?

Follow The Link To Find Out Why Hitchcock's "Psycho" Gave Birth To "Slasher" Films.

http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/opinions/going-in-for-the-kill-influence-and-originality-in-three-horror-classics.php

http://www.combustiblecelluloid.com/classic/psycho.shtml

Writer Andrew Katsis' Current #1 film of 1960:
1) Psycho (Alfred Hitchcock)
2) The Apartment (Billy Wilder)
3) Peeping Tom (Michael Powell)
4) Inherit the Wind (Stanley Kramer)
5) The Time Machine (George Pal)

Currently my #1 film from director Alfred Hitchcock:
1) Psycho (1960)
2) Strangers On A Train (1951)
3) Vertigo (1958)
4) Rear Window (1954)
5) Rope (1948)
6) Rebecca (1940)
7) North by Northwest (1959)
8) I Confess (1953)
9) The Lady Vanishes (1938)
10) Spellbound (1945)

Posted by ackatsis at 8:12 PM
Labels: 10/10, 1960, 1960s, Alfred Hitchcock, Anthony Perkins, horror, Janet Leigh, Repeat Viewing, thriller, Top 100, Vera Miles

[Question: Is Director Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho Available On DVD yet?]

Yes, Director Alfred Hitchcock 1960 film Psycho...Is Available on DVD in order to compare all four versions...just visit...dvdbeaver in order to compare the picture quality of....Universal (2-disc Legacy Series) - Region 1- NTSC vs. Universal Studios - Region 1 - NTSC vs. Universal Pictures (Benelux) (Psycho Collection) - Region 2 - PAL vs. Universal Tri-Star (Australia) - Region 2,4 - PAL Gary Tooze Compare Hitchcock's Psycho
The Trailer For The 1960 Film "Psycho"....


Tomorrow: Nick puts us all out of our Misery.


5 people have chosen wisely: on "30 dAyS oF cRaZy: Psycho"

Who Is Afraid of Alfred Hitchcock? said...

Bonjour! Fletch...
Merci, for posting my reviewer Andrew Katsis' review of Hitchcock's 1960 Classic film...Psycho...I know one thing is true and that is I don't have to add this film to my Christmas list.

Once again,
Merci,for sharing!
DeeDee ;-D

Fitz said...

I feel bad for the people who can't go into this and watch it w/o knowing the ending (but that's probably impossible in this day and age).

Who Is Afraid of Alfred Hitchcock? said...

Bonjour! Fitz...
I totally agree with you, because I knew how the film was going to end,
I also overheard that the lead actress was going to be murdered, but I wasn't aware of the middle part of the film or what led up to the ending.

I guess that what "piqued" my curiosity more than anything what led Perkin's character Bates to commit the dastardly..."deed(s)!"

Therefore, I guess this film now just fits into the category of a film that is meant to be "examined" by film scholars and film students alike.

That is until the next generation and hopefully, they watch it before someone "spill" the beans!
Merci,
DeeDee ;-D

StuartOhQueue said...

This may be the perfect horror film. I can't wait to see how this looks in 1080p - I'm far too young to have been able to see the 35mm in theaters. I just got "North by Northwest" on Blu-ray and it looks great. The Technicolor really pops!

Ténèbres à la lumière... said...

Bonjour! StuartOhOueue...

I agree with you 100% this film just maybe the "grandfather" or the film that "gave birth" or "spawned" horror films as we know them today.

By the way, I have seen clips of Hitchcock's North by Northwest in HD and the Technicolour is...beautiful!

(Therefore, I can just imagine the picture quality of the film on a Blu-ray disc...Wow!)

Merci, for leaving a comment too!
DeeDee ;-D