Featured Posts
Showing posts with label Hugh Jackman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hugh Jackman. Show all posts

Feb 1, 2011

Fletch's Favored Five: Stars in need of a heel turn

When the bloom is off the rose, when we've seen the hero save the damsel in distress time and time again, it becomes time to try something new.

Often, stars turn to villainous roles because that's all they have left in them - Val Kilmer, for a number of reasons, just isn't the same viable leading man (or even sidekick) that he was as few as ten years ago. Thus, he becomes the evil Dieter Von Cunth in MacGruber. Tom Cruise was Hollywood's #1 "face" for more than a decade, but when the prime roles started drying up, he turned to more nefarious work and found a heaping of critical acclaim that wasn't always there in the past (Collateral, Tropic Thunder, Lions for Lambs). Harrison Ford was tremendous in the underloved What Lies Beneath...Robert DeNiro scared us all to death in The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle Cape Fear and The Untouchables, and has embraced his heel turns, evident in such fare as Machete.

You get the point. Most times, a change of pace is needed simply because we (and possibly them as well) have grown tired of seeing them play the same kinds of roles. Other times, a change comes about due to events in the star's real life (Robert Downey, Jr. was perfect for a bad guy run after all his zany misadventures; if only U.S. Marshalls had been a better overall vehicle). But mostly, it's due to a combination of the first reason thrown together with age. They get wrinkled and/or fat, and suddenly, the studios no longer want them to play the leads (not surprisingly).

So, who is due for a juicy villain role, and who do we think would excel given the opportunity? The ground rules I tried to limit myself to was this:

* A-lister, or close enough to it. People that aren't quite on the radar yet make their dough playing villains often. For a prime example, see Jeremy Renner in S.W.A.T. or Adam Scott in Torque (on second thought, perhaps you don't want to see those after all).

* Said star hasn't played a villain previously, or at least not since getting famous. George Clooney (our resident example for the next few points) might have played the bad guy in Return of the Killer Tomatoes (which I doubt he did), but it wouldn't count anyway since no one knew who he was at the time. (See above ground rule.)

* Assholes don't count; only villains do. Intolerable Cruelty, Burn After Reading...George was no villain. Imperfect yes, but that's it. We get into kind of a gray area with anithero roles like in From Dusk Till Dawn, but no one can convince me that that's a proper heel turn, either.

* I haven't seen every movie ever made and can only do so much research. If Clooney was the tabbed by his pal Robert Rodriguez to cameo as a villain in Spy Kids, well, you'll just have to excuse me not not knowing that. Besides, I'm talking HIGH profile villains here - think Collateral or Cage/Travolta in Face/Off. Just correct me if I'm wrong.


Honorable mentions:

* Brad Pitt - I so wanted to put him not only on the list, but at the top. However, even I couldn't b.s. myself out of knowing that between Early Grayce and Tyler Durden, he's played a villain in one form or another. He's also played antiheroes a number of times.

* Jennifer Aniston - Just do something different, Jen. Why not a bitchy role in the Miranda Priestley vein?

* Adam Sandler - he can certainly look scary (Zohan), and he loves to do accents. Marry the two and don't smirk at the end for the kiddies.

* Orlando Bloom - He's in need of a career resurgence - why not give it a shot?

The Favored Five

5. George Clooney

Hey, whaddaya know - it's like we've been here before! Anyway, most recently, we saw Clooney turn off his million-watt smile for a quiet role as a hit man in The American. We know the guy can act, and we know the guy can overact when he wants to (Intolerable Cruelty again). I'd love to see him throw on an accent and really turn the screws on someone.

4. Natalie Portman

So typecast as the virginal goody-two-shoes is Ms. Portman that she took a role in which that was the major arc for her character. Better yet, I think she could actually pull it off quite nicely, either by playing up her girlie charms and then stabbing the hero in the back or by playing it straight with the intensity she showed at the end of Black Swan.

3. Hugh Jackman

Not too dissimilar from my number one choice, Jackman is in dire need of some edge. Sure, he brings some of it to the role of Wolverine, but never has there been a cuddlier vermin than there is inhabited by Mr. Song and Dance. He can snarl and flare his nostrils all he wants, but we know the pearly whites that lie beneath.

2. Keanu Reeves

Came close in The Gift - he was definitely an asshole and a character that nobody liked, but a) it wasn't seen by hardly anyone, b) it wasn't that type of movie, and c) if it were, he wasn't the main baddie. That said, if you've seen it - along with pieces of The Devil's Advocate - you know that Reeves more than has the chops to pull it off. And, for a number of reasons, don't you dare mention The Day the Earth Stood Still...

1. Will Smith

There was some talk not long ago of Smith playing Cain in a film titled, creatively, The Legend of Cain, in which he would take down Abel, but there's no record of the film on his IMDb page, and the last bit of chatter about it was in July of last year. And yet, is there a more golden boy (man) in all of Hollywood right now? True, he hasn't been in much lately, but when he has, he hits big, and is this generation's equivalent of Tom Cruise if ever there was one. It's time to go sinister, Fresh Prince. Just ask Family Guy:

And then...

Feb 18, 2007

One from the Video Vault: X:Men - The Last Stand

What's more surprising - that the third X:Men movie is (arguably) the strongest, or that said movie was directed by Rush Hour helmer and otherwise hack Brett Ratner?

I'm going to go with the latter, and your welcome, Brett, for the backhanded compliment.

All jokes aside, I was truly shocked when I saw X:Men: The Last Stand in the theater. While the first in the series is very good, and the second not far behind, it was hard to expect much from the third, especially considering the aforementioned Ratner attached to direct. Maybe it was lowered expectations, but I walked out of the theater believing that this third installment was superior to the first two. Shocking, indeed.

Out on DVD for some time now and sitting amongst the Fletch Film Library for a few months, it was time to watch it again. I'm glad to say that it didn't disappoint on this repeat viewing, though I'm a bit unsure of its ranking in regards to the first installment (it's close regardless).

The story line follows the path laid out by the first two films (humans are afraid of mutants, everyone is unsure of where to go from there). The twist here is that a mutant (a teenaged boy) turns out to be the golden egg that the normal folk have been looking for all along. His mutation? He "cures" all mutants who come into close proximity with him. Naturally, an anti-mutant activist brings science into the mix and, long story short, proceeds to produce a flu shot-type cure for all mutants. Chaos ensues.

Unfortunately, the story line also becomes muddied by the Jean Grey/Dark Phoenix tangent. Though Jean may be a larger character in the comics (and though most comics or comic-based films would benefit from having more females in the picture), the picture suffers as a result. Sure, it's nice to have a love interest for the de-facto star of the trilogy, Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) - but not at the expense of the overall story. The character has almost nothing to do with the rest of the movie and would have been better without her (as would some other characters involved...).

84 out of 100

(By the way, in case I don't review the first two anytime soon - which is likely - I would probably give the first film an 83 and the second a 78. Though never a GREAT series, the X:Men films didn't disappoint many fans, either, and that's worth something.)
And then...